Home Projects Forum Your Input NGOs NGO comparison: basics NGO comparison: financials Glossary

greendonor.org

Conservation International

Conservation International Foundation
1919 M St., Ste. 600
Washington, DC 20036
U.S.A.
(202) 912-1000
www.conservation.org

Founded in 1987


Where do they work?
Who works there?
What do they do?
What have they accomplished?
Financial data
How do they raise money?
Media and public discussion of the organization
Assessment by greendonor contributors

WHERE DO THEY WORK?


Conservation International (CI) has headquarters in the U.S.A. and works in 44 countries around the world, as follows: In addition, CI includes among its "biodiversity hotspots" the Mediterranean Basin, the Caucasus, Polynesia-Micronesia (Pacific), and the California Floristic Province (U.S.A and Mexico).

WHO WORKS THERE?


CI has a staff of around 850, of which a majority are "foreign nationals".

CI's 2004 Annual Report lists a "senior leadership team" of 75 people: 4 top executives, 21 "headquarters leadership" (9 of whom have PhDs), 31 "in-country leadership" and 19 "in-country technical leadership". CI founder Peter Seligmann is CEO and Chairman of the Board; PhD biologist Russell Mittermeier is President; Gustavo Fonseca, PhD, is Executive VP, Programs and Science; and Niels Crone is CFO and Executive VP, Administration, Finance and Human Resources.

Field program staff include economists, biologists, anthropologists, social scientists, and legal and policy experts. More than 90% of CI's "in-country" staff are nationals of the countries where they work.

CI contracts out work to small, localized "conservation partners". About a quarter of their revenue in 2004 was spent that way and they plan to allocate one-third of the budget to "collaborative efforts" in the 2005 fiscal year.

The 33-member Board of Directors is chaired by CI CEO Peter Seligmann, and includes 21 business executives (mainly U.S., but also from Brazil, the Philippines and Great Britain), 3 people from law firms, two "conservationists", Harvard biologist E.O. Wilson, Peter McPherson, President of Michigan State University, a teacher, actor Harrison Ford, Queen Noor of Jordan, and Lt. General S.K.I. Khama, Vice President of the Republic of Botswana.

Business executives on the CI Board include Gordon Moore, co-founder of Intel Corporation and major philanthropist of conservation and science; Robert J. Fisher, Board Chairman of Gap, Inc.; Orin Smith, head of Starbucks Coffee; and Rob Walton, Board Chairman of Wal-Mart.

Top

WHAT DO THEY DO?


CI addresses what it considers to be the most urgent conservation priorities worldwide, and employs a "core strategy of blending science, partnerships, and human welfare". Much of CI's work is organized around three key efforts, which focus on the world's "most species-rich places":
  1. Biodiversity Hotspots — 34 regions around the world that make up 2.3% of the Earth's surface (7.9% of the land surface) but contain an estimated 50% of all vascular plant species and 42% of terrestrial vertebrate species, and harbour 75% of the most endangered mammals, birds and amphibians.
  2. High-biodiversity Wilderness Areas — five large areas of relatively pristine habitat; these have more than 70% of their original vegetation, have low human population densities, and "are among the last places where indigenous peoples can maintain traditional lifestyles". The five, which comprise 6.1% of the planet's land area, are:
    • Amazonia
    • Congo Forests
    • Miombo-Mopane Woodlands and Savannahs of Southern Africa
    • New Guinea
    • North American Deserts (southwest U.S.A. and Mexico)
  3. Key Marine Regions — a priority CI goal for 2005-2010 is to "establish protective management regimes in five key seascapes covering ocean ecosystems with the most species at risk" and to initiate 20 new marine protected areas. As part of this effort, CI addresses ocean governance, sustainable fisheries, integrated coastal and ecosystem based management, education, and research on marine management and on the conservation status of marines species.

About two-thirds of CI's program spending goes to its field programs (in the Neotropics, Asia/Pacific, and Africa & Madagascar) which it carries out directly or with local contractees. Smaller portions of its budget support three CI Centers:

Top
Conservation International's Funding Division finances CI's field programs and manages three funds with varying mandates: Those three funds provided about $20-million in support for CI's programs in FY 2004, with more than $15-million going to 125 "partners" (external recipients).

Finally, CI programs include these:

Population-Environment Program — CI began this program in 1998 with financial help from various foundations, USAID, and the Univ. of Michigan Population Fellows Program. It has added reproductive health components to CI's field projects in biodiversity hotspots and wilderness areas in Mexico, Guatemala, and Madagascar, and in 2003, in Belize, the Philippines, and southern Africa. The program provides voluntary family planning and reproductive health care; helps to set up economic enterprises as alternatives to ecosystem destruction; and promotes the economic and educational empowerment of women (which has been shown to be key to population control, among other benefits).
Resource Economics Program — This program conducts "rapid assessments" of socioeconomic conditions in relation to conservation and uses the results to guide its own programs and to make recommendations to governments and other "stakeholders and decision-makers". Such assessments have been done in areas of Brazil and Indonesia and are underway in China, Ecuador and Mexico.
Ecotourism — CI helps local communities establish and manage ecotourism businesses.
Education — CI focusses its education program on "critical publics, such as decision-makers, journalists and teachers". (CI has produced three award-winning videos on conservation issues.)

Top

WHAT HAVE THEY ACCOMPLISHED?


[ to be done: overall summary...]

Some specifics follow, in chronological order.

These are some of the reported accomplishments in financial year 2000-2001 (FY 2001):

Top

Accomplishments in FY 2002:

Top

Accomplishments in FY 2003:

Top

Accomplishments in FY 2004:

Top

FINANCIAL DATA


In October 2001, the Gordon and Betty Moore Family Foundation (Moore Foundation) committed to providing CI with a series of grants totalling $261-million over 10 years, which CI says is the largest gift ever to a private conservation group. Of this amount, $121.2-million is for the Centers of Biodiversity Conservation; $40-million is for Scientific Field Stations; and $100-million is for the Global Conservation Fund. Much [HOW much???] of the money was received during CI's 2002 financial year under terms that it is to be spent during the ten-year period. Thus, CI's revenue and assets received a large boost that year.

There is a discrepancy between the financial information given in the charitable returns CI has submitted to the IRS, which count all the revenue from the Moore Foundation grant as occurring at the time received, and the financial summaries CI gives in its annual reports, in which the stated revenue includes a portion of the gift that is applied in that year.

Unfortunately, CI does not give a complete financial statement in its annual reports (up to the most recent, for 2004), nor is that information available on its website.

Table 1: Basic financial data for Conservation International for the most recent years.
FISCAL YEAR
FINANCIAL DATA
rounded to million (m) or thousand (K)
EXPENDITURES
percent of total expenses
2003
(ending June 30, 2003)
Total revenue:
Total expenses:

Total assets (yr-end):
Total liabilities (yr-end):

$43.6m1
$83.7m

$261m
$20.8m

Programs:
Administration:
Fundraising:
------------------
wages/benefits:
professional & consulting fees:
85%
10%
5%
------------------
40%
8%
2002
(ending June 30, 2002)
Total revenue:
Total expenses:

Total assets (yr-end):
Total liabilities (yr-end):

$223m1
$69.0m

$292m
$12.1m

Programs:
Administration:
Fundraising:
------------------
wages/benefits:
professional & consulting fees:
84%
10%
6%
------------------
42%
10%
2001
(ending June 30, 2001)
Total revenue:
Total expenses:

Total assets (yr-end):
Total liabilities (yr-end):

$69.0m
$52.4m

$133m
$5.39m

Programs:
Administration:
Fundraising:
------------------
wages/benefits:
professional & consulting fees:
83%
11%
6%
------------------
41%
14%
NOTES:
Source: IRS Form 990 (courtesy of www.guidestar.org).
1  The sharp increase in revenue and assets in FY 2002 reflects an extraordinary gift of $261m from the Moore Foundation that is to be spent over a ten-year period. In 2003, CI's annual report gives an "operating revenue" of $85.0m that includes a portion of that gift. The figure above, of $43.6m, presumably includes only revenue actually received in that financial year.
Assets: in the most recent year (2002-2003), the main components were:
  • grants receivable (76%)
  • savings and temporary cash investments (18%)
  • securities (5%)
  • land, buildings, & equipment (1%)
  • Liabilities: in the most recent year (2002-2003), the main components were:
  • grants payable (61%)
  • accounts payable & accrued expenses (24%)
  • accrued vacation (8%)
  • mortgages & other notes payable (7%)
  • The figure for wages/benefits is the amount across all 3 categories (program, administrative and fundraising) as a percent of total expenses. Likewise for professional/consulting/contract fees. In the latter figure, CI includes fees for services provided by other NGOs.
     

    Table 2: Breakdown of revenue for the 2002-2003 financial year.
    Revenue Category
    As percent of total revenues
    Private individuals, companies, foundations1 71%
    Government grants 26%
    Net investment income & interest 2%
    Other2 1%
    1 See below for the breakdown of this category into the three components for the 2003-2004 financial year.
    2 "Other" revenue: net revenue from: rent, asset sales other than securities, inventory sales, and special events, plus "other income".

    Table 3: Breakdown of program expenditures for the 2002-2003 financial year, using data from IRS Form 990. The breakdown of field programs is from CI's 2004 annual report.
    Program
    As percent of total program spending
    Field programs (57% Neotropics, 22% Africa & Madagascar, 21% Asia Pacific) 64%
    Center for Applied Biodiversity Sciences 13%
    Technical support 11%
    Center for Environmental Leadership in Business 5%
    Communication and education 5%
    Center for Conservation & Government 3%

    Table 4: Compensation for senior full-time staff for the 2002-2003 financial year.
    Compensation Number of individuals Job title(s)
    $225,000 1 Chairman & CEO
    $220,000 1 President
    $163,092 1 Executive VP - Programs & Science
    $25,577 & $136,046-$150,000 7 Six Senior VPs and one Chief Information Officer
    $119,025-$146,016 5 Five VPs

    We note that in the three years examined, the proportion of costs for (1) "compensation of officers, directors, etc." and (2) "other salaries and wages" is the same in the three categories of program, administrative and fundraising expenses, suggesting that allocations of staff time were made by applying one set of estimates to both management and other staff, rather than by independent measures of time budgets.

    The amounts spent on outside professional services were relatively small. Amounts received by the five highest paid independent contractors ranged from $134,196 to $291,316. These five included Birdlife International, the American Museum of Natural History and the IUCN.

    Top

    HOW DO THEY RAISE MONEY?


    With the large Moore Foundation ten-year grant beginning in late 2001, foundations have become CI's biggest source of revenue, up from 30% in the 2001 financial year to 51% in the 2004 financial year. The following breakdown of revenue is from the financial summary in CI's 2004 annual report.

    REVENUE SOURCEPERCENT OF REVENUE
    20042001
    Foundations51%30%
    Governments, NGOs, and Multilaterals24%18%
    Individuals16%35%
    Corporations8%14%
    Investment & Other Income1%3%

    CI does no direct marketing or mass mailings.

    Top

    MEDIA AND PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF THE ORGANIZATION


    A World Watch Magazine article from December 2004 entitled "A Challenge To Conservationists" presented a strong critique of ...

    CI's response

    Top

    ASSESSMENT BY GREENDONOR CONTRIBUTORS


    [This section awaits the accumulation of input from visitors to the greendonor site.]

    Top

    NGOs NGO comparison:
    basic info
    NGO comparison:
    financial info
    Glossary
    Home Projects Forum Your Input