greendonor.org

Note: For viewing only - not submittable

Your assessment of a particular organization

Organization:
 

The organization's effectiveness at accomplishing its goals:
  [of limited effectiveness ] [quite effective ] [highly effective ]
 

The organization's effectiveness relative to that of other organizations with similar goals:
  [below par ] [about average ] [ one of the better ones ] [ the best ]
 

Rate (from 1-4, poor to excellent) the organization on the following aspects:

1234
scientific grounding  
program design  
implementation of programs  
administration  
financial management  
accuracy and honesty of the organization's literature  
long-term followup on projects  
assessment of outcomes of its programs, & learning therefrom  

 

How well do the organization's programs contribute to the following:
 
slight-
ly
fairly
well
very
well
N/A*
CONSERVATION stemming biodiversity loss
conserving (or restoring) important natural areas
HUMAN DEVELOPMENTaddressing the local human component of conservation efforts
LAWS & AGREEMENTSpromoting government policies, legislation or international agreements that advance conservation and/or sustainable resource use
promoting legislation, enforcement and international agreements to improve/maintain environmental quality
ENDANGERED SPECIESpromoting the legal protection of threatened/endangered species
direct measures to aid threatened/endangered species
COMPANIES & CONSUMERSthrough work with the private sector and/or consumers, better corporate practices in relation to the environment and conservation
RESEARCH studies/research/inventories yielding information of importance to conservation
studies relating to environmental issues
EDUCATIONeducating the public on environmental and/or conservation concerns
* N/A = not applicable.
 

What are the organization's strengths?
 

What are the organization's weaknesses?

How might it improve its effectiveness?

Other remarks about this organization (if any):

 

What is your opinion of this organization based on:
member/supporter of it (present or past)
currently on its paid staff
formerly on its paid staff
volunteer worker for it (present or past)
work/worked with (but not for) the organization
have friend(s)/relative(s) with first-hand knowledge of the organization
work/worked for another conservation/environmental NGO
work/worked in the field of conservation biology
work/worked in the field of environmental science
work/worked in the field of environmental law
work/worked in related area of government in public service
work/worked as or for a politician
well read on conservation/environmental matters
familiar with the conservation/environmental scene for other reasons
 

Is your knowledge of it:   [limited ] [considerable ] [extensive ]
 

On or off the record:  Given a sufficient volume of survey results, we may eventually offer a more transparent version of survey results, in which the pool of "on-the-record" respondents for each NGO can be viewed as a list of each respondent's name, occupation, and location. Only pooled (not your individual) results will be displayed; hence your assessment will remain anonymous, but your participation in the survey will not.

Do you wish to be "on the record", as described in the preceding paragraph? [ Yes ] [ No ]

Home | NGOs | Projects | Forum |Glossary | Input